MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2238539465 · doi:10.1149/ma2015-03/3/639

Mixed Reactant Low Temperature Fuel Cells: The Swiss-Roll Cell Design and Selective Electrocatalysts

2015· article· en· W2238539465 on OpenAlexaff
Előd Gyenge

Bibliographic record

VenueECS Meeting Abstracts · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicElectrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsElectrocatalystProton exchange membrane fuel cellAnodeFaraday efficiencyElectrochemistrySodium borohydrideChemistryCathodeCatalysisDirect-ethanol fuel cellBorohydrideChemical engineeringInorganic chemistryAlkaline fuel cellHydrogenOxideElectrodeElectrolyteOrganic chemistryPhysical chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Eliminating the proton exchange membrane (PEM) together with the platinum-based anode and cathode catalysts and replacing the bulky bipolar plates with lighter and flexible alternatives, would significantly improve the economic outlook of low temperature fuel cells operated with liquid fuels. To address the afore-mentioned issues of PEM fuel cells, at the University of British Columbia we have developed a novel mixed reactant fuel cell design referred to as the Swiss-roll cell, fed with a two-phase mixture of liquid fuel and air (or oxygen) [1-5]. Here, a research progress review is presented related to both selective electrocatalysis and Swiss-roll cell engineering applied to two alkaline fuel cell systems: sodium borohydride – oxygen and sodium borohydride – nitrous oxide, respectively. On the anode, the borohydride electro-oxidation reaction is a complex, up to eight electron transfer process, with possibly competing hydrogen evolution generated by either faradaic (i.e., electrocatalytic) or non-faradaic (i.e., thermocatalytic) pathways. Experimental results correlated with density functional theory modelling predictions are discussed focused on the borohdyride electro-oxidation mechanism on catalysts such as: Pt, Au and Os. On the cathode side, in case of the oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) in alkaline media the comparative performance of gas diffusion electrodes with electrocatalysts such as MnO2, Ag and Fe-aminoantypyrine (Fe-AAPyr) is presented. For nitrous oxide reduction, the electrode kinetics on Pd and Pt electrocatalysts are compared. It is shown that the selective electrocatalyst discovery combined with cell electrochemical engineering innovations enables significant improvements in the power output, reaching 250 mW/cm2 for the membrane-free Swiss-roll mixed-reactant direct borohdyride fuel cell operated at 50 0C and near atmospheric pressure using non-platinum anode and cathode catalysts. References: A. Aziznia, C. Oloman and E.L. Gyenge, J.Power Sources , 212, 154-160 (2012). A. Aziznia, C. Oloman and E.L. Gyenge, ChemSusChem , 6, 847-855 (2013). A. Serov, A. Aziznia, P. H. Benhangi, K. Artyushkova, P. Atanassov and E. Gyenge, J. Mat. Chem. A, 1, 14384-14391, (2013). A. Aziznia, C. Oloman and E.L. Gyenge, J.Power Sources , 265, 201-213 (2014). C. W. Oloman, British Patent GB 2474202, 2012. Figure 1

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueECS Meeting Abstracts→Same topicElectrocatalysts for Energy Conversion→French-language works237,207→