MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2238857528 · doi:10.1021/acs.cgd.5b01360

1,4-Bis(arylthio)but-2-enes as Assembling Ligands for (Cu<sub>2</sub>X<sub>2</sub>)<sub><i>n</i></sub> (X = I, Br; <i>n</i> = 1, 2) Coordination Polymers: Aryl Substitution, Olefin Configuration, and Halide Effects on the Dimensionality, Cluster Size, and Luminescence Properties

2016· article· en· W2238857528 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueCrystal Growth & Design · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicMetal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCentre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueFonds Québécois de la Recherche sur la Nature et les Technologies
KeywordsSBusCrystallographyChemistryLigand (biochemistry)StereochemistryReceptorMetal-organic framework

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

CuI reacts with E -PhS(CH 2 CH═CHCH 2 )SPh, L1, to afford the coordination polymer (CP) [Cu 2 I 2 {μ- E -PhS(CH 2 CH═CHCH 2 )SPh} 2 ] n ( 1a ). The unprecedented square-grid network of 1 is built upon alternating two-dimensional (2D) layers with an ABAB sequence and contains rhomboid Cu 2 (μ 2 -I) 2 clusters as secondary building units (SBUs). Notably, layer A, interconnected by bridging L1 ligands, contains exclusively dinuclear units with short Cu···Cu separations [2.6485(7) Å; 115 K]. In contrast, layer B exhibits Cu···Cu distances of 2.8133(8) Å. The same network is observed when CuBr reacts with L1 . In the 2D network of [Cu 2 Br 2 {μ- E -PhS(CH 2 CH═CHCH 2 )SPh} 2 ] n ( 1b ), isotype to 1a, one square-grid-type layer contains Cu 2 (μ 2 -Br) 2 SBUs with short Cu···Cu contacts [2.7422(6) Å at 115K], whereas the next layer incorporates exclusively Cu 2 (μ 2 -Br) 2 SBUs with a significantly longer Cu···Cu separation [2.9008(10) Å]. The evolution of the crystallographic parameters of 1a and 1b was monitored between 115 and 275 K. Conversely, the isomeric Z -PhS(CH 2 CH═CHCH 2 )SPh ligand L2 reacts with CuI to form the 2D CP [Cu 4 (μ 3 -I) 4 (μ- Z -PhS(CH 2 CH═CHCH 2 )SPh} 2 ] n ( 2a ) with closed-cubane SBUs. A dinuclear zero-dimensional complex [Cu 2 Br 2 {μ- Z -PhS(CH 2 CH═CHCH 2 )SPh} 2 ] ( 2b ) is formed when CuBr is reacted with L2 . Upon reaction of E -TolS(CH 2 CH═CHCH 2 )STol, L3, with CuI, the 2D CP [{Cu(μ 3 -I)} 2 (μ- L3 )] n containing parallel-arranged infinite inorganic staircase ribbons, is generated. When CuX reacts with Z -TolS(CH 2 CH═CHCH 2 )STol, L4, the isostructural 2D CPs [Cu 2 X 2 {μ- Z -TolS(CH 2 CH═CHCH 2 )STol} 2 ] (4a X = I; 4b X = Br) are formed. In contrast to the CPs 1a,b, the layers based on rhombic grids of 4a,b incorporate Cu 2 (μ 2 -X) 2 SBUs featuring uniformly identical Cu···Cu distances within each layer. The TGA traces showed that all these materials are stable up to ∼200 °C. Moreover, the photophysical properties have been studied, including absorption, emission, excitation spectra, and emission lifetimes at 298 and 77 K. The spectra were interpreted using density functional theory (DFT) and time-dependent DFT calculations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.037
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it