MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2238942258

Motivations, Experiences, and Community Contributions of Young In-migrants in the Maitland Area, Nova Scotia

2016· article· en· W2238942258 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Margaret MacMichael, Karen Beazley, Kathleen Kevany, Dianne Looker, Deborah Stiles

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of rural and community development · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicRural development and sustainability
Canadian institutionsMount Saint Vincent UniversityAcadia UniversityDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNova scotiaEnthusiasmClosure (psychology)SociologyPolitical scienceGender studiesPsychologySocial psychologyEthnology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper examines the motivations, experiences, and community contributions associated with rural in-migration processes in the community of Maitland, Nova Scotia. Similar to other research, major factors motivating rural in-migration include quality of life, life course, physical landscape and amenities, and economic and employment factors. Young, female in-migrants expressed having a positive experience, largely due to the friendliness and neighbourliness of other residents. Although the participants reported positive experiences overall, they were not without challenge. Two significant obstacles identified were finding or creating satisfactory employment and increasing access to opportunities in the community. By exploring beyond the actual move and migrant experiences, this research revealed key factors in ongoing mobility and migrants’ long-term decision-making. Whether or not the young in-migrants’ plan to stay depended on a variety of factors including employment, life course, and changes in the community such as a school closure. Community consequences arising from in-migration, beyond job creation and entrepreneurship, were also explored. The young in-migrants were involved directly in volunteer organizations, attended community events, and developed relationships and a sense of community, demonstrating formal and informal contributions to community life. The energy, new ideas, and perspectives they brought to organizations and events, were viewed as positive by key informants from the community, and with enthusiasm by the young in-migrants themselves. Keywords: rural communities, in-migration, young, Nova Scotia, wellbeing, motivation, community consequences ---------------------------------------------- themselves. Résumé Cet article examine les motivations, expériences, et contributions communautaires associées aux processus de migration ruraux dans la communauté de Maitland, en Nouvelle-Écosse. À l'instar d'autres recherches, d'importants facteurs motivant la migration en territoire rural incluent la qualité de vie, le parcours de vie, le paysage physique et les infrastructures, ainsi que les facteurs économiques et d'emploi. De jeunes femmes migrantes ont partagé leur expérience positive, largement due à l'amabilité et à l'esprit de bon voisinage des autres résidents. Même si les participants ont généralement rapporté avoir eu une expérience positive, celles-ci ne furent pas sans défi. Deux obstacles en particulier furent de trouver ou de créer un emploi satisfaisant, et d augmenter l'accès aux opportunités dans la communauté. En explorant au delà des mouvements et expériences des migrants, cette recherche a révélé les facteurs clé de la mobilité en cours et de la prise de décisions à long terme des migrants. La décision d'un jeune migrant de s'installer ou non dépend d'une variété de facteurs dont la capacité d'emploi, le parcours de vie et les changements dans une communauté tels qu'une fermeture d'école. Les conséquences communautaires découlant de la migration, au delà de la création d'emploi et de l'entreprenariat, sont aussi explorées. Les jeunes migrants sont directement impliqués dans les organisations volontaires, participent à des événements communautaires et développent des relations ainsi qu'un sens de la communauté, démontrant des contributions formelles et informelles à cela vie communautaire. L'énergie, les nouvelles idées et perspectives qu'ils apportent aux organisations et événements sont vues comme positives par les informateurs clés de la communauté et avec enthousiasme par les jeunes migrants eux-mêmes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.810
Threshold uncertainty score0.378

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0040.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.000
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2016
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of rural and community development→Same topicRural development and sustainability→French-language works237,207→