La percezione della norma linguistica attraverso il periodico La Crusca per voi
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
tobre 1990 con una Giustificazione e Un po' di storia, in cui il fondatore Giovanni Nencioni spiega le ragioni dell'istituzione di un vero e proprio consultorio linguistico, destinato ad accogliere le richieste, i dubbi, le perplessit sul corretto impiego della lingua italiana proveniente da persone di ogni livello sociale e culturale. Scopo di questo lavoro studiare la tipologia dei quesiti posti agli accademici della Crusca, con particolare attenzione a fenomeni di carattere lessicale, negli ultimi diciotto numeri del periodico (dal 2005 al 2013, con qualche prelievo da uscite precedenti). Conclude il lavoro una breve indagine a campione sulla diffusione e la traducibilit di alcuni termini stranieri in italiano.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it