Les nouvelles représentations dramaturgiques de la femme au Québec (2000-2010) : Fanny Britt, Evelyne de la Chenelière et Jennifer Tremblay, un féminisme diversifié
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Peut-on qualifier la dramaturgie féminine contemporaine québécoise de féministe ? Ce mémoire répond par l’affirmative. Il montre que la dramaturgie féminine québécoise actuelle participe d’une nouvelle prise de parole féministe, plus complexe et plus diversifiée que celle des années 1970-1980, et qui tend notamment à conjuguer discours social et poétique de l’intime. Chaque jour de Fanny Britt (2011), L’Imposture d’Evelyne de la Chenelière (2009) et La Liste de Jennifer Tremblay (2008) proposent en effet des éléments novateurs quant à la représentation dramaturgique de la femme, tournant autour de trois imaginaires significatifs : l’imaginaire médiatique, l’imaginaire maternel et l’imaginaire du rapport hommes-femmes. En comparant les pièces entre elles ainsi qu’à quelques pièces charnières des décennies antérieures, il sera démontré que Chaque jour, L’Imposture et La Liste proposent de nouvelles représentations de la femme dans le paysage théâtral et social québécois. Enfin, ce mémoire vise à déterminer si la prise de parole féministe de ces pièces correspond au féminisme de la troisième vague.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.015 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".