Peripheral Anti-Imperialism: The New Revisionism and the History of Argentine Foreign Relations in the Era of the Kirchners
Bibliographic record
Abstract
After 2000, a funny thing happened to the political language of the new leftin South America. While leaders in many countries and of many political stripesregularly evoke the past, Venezuelan president Hugo Chávez made a science ofhistoricizing current problems by reviving the distant and forgotten as relevantand poignant. The point of the exercise was to resurrect obscured narrative ashistorical revision with sharp, current political meaning. In 2007, for example,at the height of a simmering dispute with the Colombian government, Chávezaccused Colombian president Álvaro Uribe of fronting for a “Santanderistaoligarchy.”2 Less striking than the evocation of a contentious narrative on howindependence era icon Simón Bolivar died (murdered by his erstwhile ally,Brigadier General Francisco Santander) was Chávez’s confidence that an ancientstory of political betrayal could resonate with his supporters. How manypolitical leaders can trot out a two centuries-old story and make it meaningfulto followers in contexts of current political debate?
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.012 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".