MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2239396529

Economic and Environmental Resolutions of Coal in Cement Industry

2015· article· en· W2239396529 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvances in natural science/Advances in natural sciences · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGeomechanics and Mining Engineering
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCoalDemolitionPollutionEnvironmental pollutionEnvironmental scienceWaste managementChinaEnvironmentally friendlyNatural resource economicsBusinessAir pollutionEnvironmental engineeringEnvironmental economicsEnvironmental protectionEngineeringCivil engineeringEconomics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

According to the latest statistics, the main reason of the increase of fog and haze in China lies in the increased air pollution emission caused by enlarged energy demand of the whole society every year. The pollution mainly comes from thermoelectric emissions, heavy chemical industry enterprises, automobile exhaust, residential heating in winter, living (cooking, hot water), urban construction and demolition, etc. One main reason is industrial pollution, and the pollution caused by coal-use accounts for more than 65% of the total industrial pollution. This paper aims at the useful skills of industrial coal to enable enterprises to use coal more economically and more environmentally friendly, so that enterprises can save costs, duly fulfill their social responsibilities to environmental cause and achieve economic and environmental benefits.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.059
Threshold uncertainty score0.693

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.003
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it