Bibliographic record
Abstract
Rubens Gouvea Lintz, professor emerito da McMaster University (Canada) , um renomado matematico, que se dedicou especialmente a historia da matematica; trabalhou em varias instituicoes no Brasil (UFBA, USP, UNICAMP). Possuidor de uma vasta cultura, publicou Historia da matematica , em dois volumes quando esteve associado ao Centro de Logica e Espistemologia, na Unicamp. Em nota de divulgacao desta obra (disponivel on-line em http://www.cle.unicamp.br/principal/?q=node/83 ), lemos: Ne ste trabalho, em dois volumes, e apresentado um estudo da Historia da Matematica sob um ângulo diferente do usual na literatura. Escrito num estilo bastante original e com um discurso cientifico rigoroso, o texto e pontuado por observacoes e comentarios cheios de humor [...] apresentando uma analise do conhecimento matematico num enfoque cultural e politico. Sua publicacao e mais uma contribuicao significativa do CLE a cultura academica, reconhecendo e divulgando um dos mais destacados intelectuais brasileiros.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.017 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.005 | 0.008 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.100 | 0.061 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".