MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2239749648 · doi:10.1090/conm/688/13826

Graded simple modules and loop modules

2017· other· en· W2239749648 on OpenAlexafffund
Alberto Elduque, Mikhail Kochetov

Bibliographic record

VenueContemporary mathematics - American Mathematical Society · 2017
Typeother
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAdvanced Topics in Algebra
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
FundersEuropean Social FundEuropean Regional Development FundNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMinisterio de Economía y Competitividad
KeywordsMathematicsSimple (philosophy)Loop (graph theory)Simple moduleArithmeticAlgebra over a fieldDiscrete mathematicsPure mathematicsCombinatorics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Necessary and sufficient conditions are given for a G G -graded simple module over a unital associative algebra, graded by an abelian group G G , to be isomorphic to a loop module of a simple module, as well as for two such loop modules (associated to a subgroup H H of G G ) to be isomorphic to each other. Under some restrictions, these loop modules are completely reducible (as ungraded modules), and some of their invariants — inertia group, graded Brauer invariant and Schur index — which were previously defined for simple modules over graded finite-dimensional semisimple Lie algebras over an algebraically closed field of characteristic zero, are now considered in a more general and natural setting.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.054

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0160.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.067
GPT teacher head0.337
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueContemporary mathematics - American Mathematical SocietySame topicAdvanced Topics in AlgebraFrench-language works237,207