Actualidade do direito do consumidor no Brasil: 20 anos do código de defesa do consumidor, conquistas e novos desafios
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Ha 21 anos, mais precisamente em 11-9-1990, era sancionada a Lei no 8.078, mais conhecida como Codigo de Defesa do Consumidor, entrando em vigor 6 meses depois, em 11-3-1991. Ao contrario do que muitos possam pensar, nao se trata nem de uma novidade no cenario juridico, nem de uma panaceia para todos os males que afligem todos nos, afinal de contas, consumidores de bens e servicos a todo instante de nossas vidas. Com efeito, quando nossa comissao, foi designada em junho de 1988, pelo entao Ministro da Justica Paulo Brossard, por proposta do extinto Conselho Nacional de Defesa do Consumidor, a tarefa se nos apresentou como sendo de grande responsabilidade, mas nao cuidamos de reinventar a roda, ate porque outros paises ja dispunham de leis de protecao ou defesa do consumidor (e.g., Espanha, Portugal, Canada, Estados Unidos, Venezuela, Mexico etc.). Alem disso, a entao IOCU � International Organization of Consumer Unions (hoje CI � Consumer International), baseando-se na Resolucao ONU 39/248, de 1985 que, por sua vez, se fundava em celebre declaracao do presidente norte-americano John Kennedy
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".