MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2239875019 · doi:10.1139/cgj-2015-0200

Influence of structure on the behavior of a saturated clayey loess

2016· article· en· W2239875019 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Geotechnical Journal · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGeotechnical Engineering and Soil Mechanics
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsOedometer testGeotechnical engineeringShearing (physics)LoessGeologySoil structureSoil waterOverburden pressureConsolidation (business)Triaxial shear testSoil scienceShear (geology)GeomorphologyPetrology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An intensive experimental investigation by means of triaxial and oedometer tests was performed on a clayey loess that was retrieved from two depths at a location on the southern Chinese Loess Plateau. Intact and reconstituted samples were used to identify the effects of the natural structure on soil behavior in saturated conditions. The behavior in compression was clearly affected by structure with the intact samples reaching well-defined gross yield points outside the intrinsic compression line of the reconstituted soil, after which the compression paths converged towards the intrinsic compression lines, behavior which is consistent with destructuration. However, very high stresses were required to give complete convergence. Similarly the triaxial tests that were carried out at lower stress levels also did not give convergence of the critical states so that different critical state lines could be defined for the intact and reconstituted soils. This was consistent with qualitative observations from scanning electron micrographs that natural elements of fabric and possibly bonding persisted even after triaxial shearing. The effects of structure at the two depths on the compression and shearing behavior were slightly larger for the shallower samples. Despite the very different genesis of the soils, it was found that similar frameworks could be applied to those used for sedimentary clays and that the degree of structure was equivalent to a clay of medium sensitivity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.670
Threshold uncertainty score0.343

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.181
Teacher spread0.175 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it