MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2240257134 · doi:10.12962/j23373539.v3i1.5380

Kajian Efisiensi Proses dan Operasi Unit Filter pada Instalasi IPA Paket Kedunguling PDAM Kabupaten Sidoarjo

2014· article· id· W2240257134 on OpenAlexaff
Abdul Khakim, Alfan Purnomo

Bibliographic record

VenueJurnal Teknik ITS · 2014
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicHeavy Metal Pollution Remediation
Canadian institutionsEncana (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAutomotive engineeringEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PDAM Delta Tirta Kabupaten Sidoarjo selalu berupaya meningkatkan pelayanan terhadap pelanggannya yaitu dengan meningkatkan pengolahan air diberbagai instalasi. Instalasi yang digunakan dalam kajian penilitian ini yaitu Instalasi Pengolahan Air di Kedunguling. IPA Kedunguling memiliki berbagai permasalahan dalam sistem proses maupun operasi tiap unitnya. Diperlukan kajian penelitian dalam menguraikan masalah tersebut. Kajian penelitian ini hanya memfokuskan masalah pada salah satu unitnya saja yaitu unit filter. Unit filter IPA ini kurang efektif dalam proses backwash dan hasilnya sehingga perlu pembenahan dalam dua hal tersebut. Ditinjau dari permasalahan itu, maka dalam kajian penelitian ini dibuat reaktor filter dengan alternatif ketebalan media dan lama waktu backwash. Alternatif media nya dibagi menjadi dua dengan beda tebal media pada media pasir silika dan antrasit sedangkan alternatif lama waktu backwash dibagi tiga yaitu 3, 5, dan 7 menit. Paramater yang dianalisa hanya parameter kekeruhan. Hasil penelitian ini yaitu media yang efektif adalah media dengan media pasir silika yang lebih tebal daripada media pasir antrasitnya, sedangkan untuk lama waktu backwashnya yang efektif adalah lama waktu 7 menit pada media efektif. Lama waktu ini dipilih karena %removalnya lebih baik dibandingkan dengan alternatif yang lainnya

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.047

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJurnal Teknik ITSSame topicHeavy Metal Pollution RemediationFrench-language works237,207