Radiography Study of Iron-Based Foreign Body Material Degradation at Different Implantation Site in Mice
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Foreign body materials enter human body through ingestion, insertion, or deposited by injury and may migrate from the entry site causing inflammation, abscess formation or undergo distant embolization. The aim of this study was to observe the degradation process of iron-based foreign body materials in different site of implantation through radiography approach. Forty two adult male ddy mice were used and iron-based implants were inserted into nape area, subcutaneously and into right femoral muscle using trocar, aseptically. The implants consisted of iron, chromium(Cr)-coated iron and stainless steel surgical wire (SS316L). Serial radiography was performed at day-1, 4 and 14 after implantation. The gray value of material density were then measured at 4 points : 2 points on both end and 2 points on the middle of the implants by using plot profile module in ImageJ® software. Results showed that the radiodensity of the implants from each group in both implantation site was increased at day-4 and materials’ radiodensity implanted subcutaneously showed higher gray value especially at peri-implant site along the side of the implant than those which implanted intramuscularly. Discussion on the degradation process and radiographic measurement is detailed in the manuscript.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".