MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2240356240

Abstract: Late Quaternary relative sea-level variations in the North Atlantic: comparison of mid-Holocene highstands to the last interglacial (isotope stage 5e) highstands

2000· article· en· W2240356240 on OpenAlexaffabout
David B. Scott, R. R. Stea

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeology and Paleoclimatology Research
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInterglacialHoloceneSea levelGeologyOceanographyQuaternaryGlacial periodDeglaciationNova scotiaClimatologyPhysical geographyGeographyPaleontology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We have sea-level curves covering the last 16,000 years from several locations in Maritime Canada but the most interesting part of the record is the last 8000 years when there is a combination of water level and land level changes that interact to produce some complex sea-level records. From 'Texas to Nova Scotia we have accelerated sea-level rise between about 6000 to 4000ybp and in South Carolina we are able to see a drop after 4200ybp. In most places in the North Atlantic there are no higher than present Holocene sea levels except perhaps Texas. However we do see, especially in Nova Scotia, what have been called shorelines which predate the last glacial and are 5l Om above present sea level. These have been discussed in the past as correlative with the worldwide stage 5e highstands of sea level, but are they really time correlative? Sea level is presently rising all along the Atlantic coast of North America and nowhere is it rising faster than in Nova Scotia. This rise has been going on for at least the last 7000 years at a rate of 20-30cm/century with an acceleration between 5000 and 4000 ybp where rates of rise were up to a metre/century. With the exception of the rapid acceleration, we believe this rise is a result of crustal adjustment following deglaciation and it if the present is the key to the past this would have happened in the last interglacial also. Most of the mid-Holocene highstands that are above present sea level are in South America or Africa where there was no glacial-isostatic adjustment-these levels are comparable to the stage 5e shorelines in the same areas. However in the North Atlantic we have not attained the highstand yet and hence probably the shorelines in Nova Scotia are not really time correlative with other stage 5e shorelines. They also do not represent the climatic optimum but some time after related to when either another glacial (stage 4) commenced or the earth finally adjusted isostatically. Judging by the Holocene experience that would be at least 4000 to 5000 years AFTER the climatic optimum of stage 5e. This same relationship must also be true for many other North Atlantic shorelines, especially in the UK where the sea-level history is similar to Nova Scotia.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.095
Threshold uncertainty score0.190

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.288
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2000
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeology and Paleoclimatology Research→French-language works237,207→