Bibliographic record
Abstract
A reduced complement of cardiomyocytes in early life can adversely affect life-long cardiac functional reserve. In the present study, using a cross-fostering approach in rats, we examined the contributions of the prenatal and postnatal environments in the programming of cardiomyocyte growth. Rat dams underwent either bilateral uterine vessel ligation (Restricted) or sham surgery (Control) on day 18 of gestation. One day after birth, Control and Restricted pups were cross-fostered onto Control (normal lactation) or Restricted (impaired lactation due to impaired mammary gland formation) mothers. In male offspring, genes involved in cardiomyocyte differentiation, proliferation, hypertrophy and apoptosis were examined at gestational day 20 and postnatal days 1 and 7 to assess effects on cardiomyocyte growth. At postnatal day 7 cardiomyocyte number was determined stereologically. Offspring were examined at age 6 mo for evidence of hypertension and pathological cardiac gene expression. There was an increase in Igf1 and Igf2 mRNA expression in hearts of Restricted pups at gestational day 20. At postnatal day 7, Agtr1a and Agtr1b mRNA expression as well as Bcl2 and Cmyc were elevated in all hearts from offspring that were prenatally or postnatally growth restricted. There was a significant reduction (-29%) in cardiomyocyte number in the Restricted-on-Restricted group. Importantly, this deficit was prevented by optimization of postnatal nutrition (in the Restricted-on-Control group). At 6 mo, blood pressure was significantly elevated in the Restricted-on-Restricted group, but there was no difference in expression of the cardiac hypertrophy, remodeling or angiogenic genes across groups. In conclusion, the findings reveal a critical developmental window, when cardiomyocytes are still proliferating, whereby improved neonatal nutrition has the capacity to restore cardiomyocyte number to normal levels. These findings are of particular relevance to the preterm infant who is born at a time when cardiomyocytes are immature and still dividing.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".