MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2240476799 · doi:10.1242/jcs.115.8.1759

The<i>FA2</i>gene of<i>Chlamydomonas</i>encodes a NIMA family kinase with roles in cell cycle progression and microtubule severing during deflagellation

2002· article· en· W2240476799 on OpenAlexaff
Moe R. Mahjoub, Ben Montpetit, Lifan Zhao, Rip J. Finst, Benjamin Goh, Apollos C. Kim, Lynne M. Quarmby

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Cell Science · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMicrotubule and mitosis dynamics
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyChlamydomonas reinhardtiiChlamydomonasBasal bodyCentrosomeCell biologyKinaseMicrotubuleCell cycleChromatinCyclin-dependent kinaseGeneticsGeneMutantFlagellum

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The NIMA kinases are one of several families of kinases that participate in driving the eukaryotic cell cycle. NIMA-related kinases have been implicated in G2/M progression, chromatin condensation and regulation of the centrosome cycle. Here we report the identification of a new member of this family, FA2, from Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. FA2 was originally discovered in a genetic screen for deflagellation-defective mutants. We have previously shown that FA2 is essential for basal-body/centriole-associated microtubule severing. We now report that the FA2 NIMA-related kinase also plays a role in cell cycle progression in Chlamydomonas. This is the first indication that members of the NIMA family might exert their effects through the regulation of microtubule severing.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations102
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Cell ScienceSame topicMicrotubule and mitosis dynamicsFrench-language works237,207