MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2240520248 · doi:10.12691/ajmcr-3-5-7

Facial Herpes Simplex Virus Type 1 Infection in a Patient with Multiple Sclerosis on Fingolimod

2015· article· en· W2240520248 on OpenAlexaffabout
Racosta Juan Manuel, Lynn McEwan, Kremenchutzky Marcelo Carlos, Morrow Sarah Anne

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Medical Case Reports · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMultiple Sclerosis Research Studies
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFingolimodMedicineHerpes simplex virusMultiple sclerosisVirusImmunologyConcomitantPopulationVirologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Fingolimod is an oral disease-modifying therapy for relapsing multiple sclerosis widely used in Canada as a second-line therapy. Fingolimod increases the risk of infections given its dose-dependent reduction of peripheral lymphocytes, due to the reversible sequestration in lymphoid tissues. We present a case of disseminated facial Herpes Simplex Virus type I infection in a patient using fingolimod, with an atypical distribution of the eruption, likely due to the concomitant exposure to sunlight and application of sunscreen. This case report provides insight about a novel mechanism of disseminationof Herpes Simplex Virus type I, which generally enters damaged epithelium or mucosal surfaces secondary to abrasions or trauma. Since Herpes Simplex Virus type I infection tends to disseminate and is accompanied by visceral involvement in immunosuppressed patients, close surveillance of viral infections and the prompt administration of full-dose antiviral therapy in this population is advised.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0030.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.083
GPT teacher head0.345
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Journal of Medical Case ReportsSame topicMultiple Sclerosis Research StudiesFrench-language works237,207