MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Preliminary results of a phase II study of continuous low dose metronomic (LDM) cyclophosphamide (CTX) and celecoxib (CEL) for asymptomatic hormone refractory prostate cancer (HRPC) with assessment of anti-angiogenic biomarkers

2007· article· en· W2240656553 on OpenAlexaffabout
Scott R. Berry, Yu‐Chieh Ko, Urban Emmenegger, Yuval Shaked, Richard Choo, Laurence Klotz, Liying Zhang, C. Lee, Robert S. Kerbel

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicInflammatory mediators and NSAID effects
Canadian institutionsHealth Sciences CentreSunnybrook Health Science Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCelecoxibAngiogenesisProstate cancerAsymptomaticInternal medicineCancerCyclophosphamideChemotherapyClinical endpointOncologyCancer researchPharmacologyClinical trial

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

14046 Background: LDM CTX is a minimally toxic anti-angiogenic therapy that has demonstrated activity in multiple tumour types including HRPC. Increased Cyclooxygenase 2 (COX 2, a prostaglandin synthase enzyme) expression appears to be a consistent feature of a variety of human tumours, including prostate cancer. COX 2 inhibitors like CEL exhibit anti-tumour activity in pre-clinical studies, at least in part due to their anti-angiogenic activity. Pre-clinical work supports the concept that the combination of selective angiogenesis inhibitors like CEL with metronomic chemotherapy can enhance the effects of these agents on tumour angiogenesis. Methods: Men with asymptomatic HRPC at a single Canadian centre received celecoxib 400 mg po BID and cyclophosphamide 50 mg po daily. The primary efficacy endpoint of this 2 stage phase II study is disease control rate (DCR): 50% PSA response, tumour response or prolonged (=6 mos) PSA or stable measurable disease. This study is also assessing the safety of LDM CTX and CEL as well as potential anti-angiogenic biomarkers in these patients including circulating endothelial cells and their precursors (CEC/P), plasma levels of thrombospondin-1 (TSP-1) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). Results: Enrollment for the first stage of this study (10 men) has been completed. There were 2 patients with disease control by the a priori criteria: one patient with a partial tumour response (PR) (PR duration 13 mos with PSA stabilization for 12 mos) and one patient that had both prolonged stable PSA (7 mos) and prolonged stable measurable disease (8 mos). In addition, another patient had an unconfirmed PR. The therapy was well tolerated. One patient had angina that responded well to medical therapy but there were no serious arterial-thromboembolic events. One patient developed grade 3 hypertension. All other toxicities were grade 1/2. Data on CEC/P, TSP-1 and VEGF levels will be presented at the meeting. Conclusions: LDM CTX + CEL is a well tolerated therapy in men with asymptomatic HRPC. 2/10 patients achieved disease control in the first stage of the trial, meeting the criteria to proceed to the second stage. [Table: see text]

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.422
Teacher spread0.390 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2007
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical OncologySame topicInflammatory mediators and NSAID effectsFrench-language works237,207