MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Improvement in Corrosion and Adhesion Resistance of a Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>-CeO<sub>2</sub> Nanocomposite Coating on the Aluminum Alloy AA6061 via Surface Pretreatment

2015· article· en· W2240873096 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Yu Han, M. Farzaneh

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvanced materials research · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicCorrosion Behavior and Inhibition
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Research ChairsUniversité du Québec à Chicoutimi
KeywordsMaterials scienceCoatingScanning electron microscopeDielectric spectroscopyCorrosionOxideContact angleFourier transform infrared spectroscopyNuclear chemistryComposite materialAdhesionMetallurgyChemical engineeringElectrochemistryChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the present study, a surface pretreatment method consisting of KOH etching followed by oxide thickening in boiling water was used to improve the corrosion and adhesion resistance of the coating. The coating morphology on non-pretreated and pretreated Al substrates was characterized by means of scanning electron microscopy (SEM), atomic force microscopy (AFM) and water contact angle measurement. FT-IR spectra was obtained by Fourier transform infrared spectrometer. The corrosion resistance of the coating in 3.5 wt.% NaCl solution was evaluated with potentiodynamic polarization (PDP) and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) techniques. The adhesion resistance of the coating was tested using ISO-2409 standard. Results show that KOH etching followed by oxide thickening in boiling water can effectively improves the corrosion resistance and durability of the coating. Besides, this surface pretreatment method can also improve significantly the adhesion resistance of the coating.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.011
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0110.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.314
Teacher spread0.277 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAdvanced materials researchSame topicCorrosion Behavior and InhibitionFrench-language works237,207