MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2240889639 · doi:10.55601/jsm.v16i2.240

Pengembangan Website untuk Bali Perabot

2015· article· en· W2240889639 on OpenAlexaff
Murdiaty Murdiaty, Gunawan Ganda, Fandi Halim

Bibliographic record

VenueJurnal SIFO Mikroskil · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicInformation Retrieval and Data Mining
Canadian institutionsTellabs (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOrder (exchange)BusinessProduct (mathematics)Scope (computer science)MarketingComputer scienceAdvertisingMathematicsFinance

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Bali Perabot is a trading business that sells various types of furniture, ranging from spring beds, cabinets, and other furniture types. Bali Perabot owner still wants to expand his business. In order to expand the area of marketing, this business has to open branches up to three branches. It surely requires a huge cost and difficult management. The complexity of the business process management is compounded when the store has to serve a lot of customers who do not do transactions, but just merely inquired information about the product that is being sold, especially if it adjacents to several festivals. Based on these problems, Bali Perabot requires a more effective solution in order to expand the marketing scope without having to open many branches and to serve a better information for customers. The solution obtained was to develop a marketing website based on the needs of Bali Perabot owner by using Joomla CMS and is equipped with additional extensions, named VirtueMart 3.0.6.2 and SJ Filter for VirtueMart - Joomla! Module. The developed website has eventually provided convenience to customers who want to search a furniture based on product category, price, and several important specifications needed to determine a product selection.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Software · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.115
Threshold uncertainty score0.383

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1150.069

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreSoftware

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJurnal SIFO MikroskilSame topicInformation Retrieval and Data MiningFrench-language works237,207