Bibliographic record
Abstract
해외취업에 대해 관심도가 높은 나라인 카나다와 호주의 방사선사를 대상으로 직업의식을 조사하여 국내 방사선사와 비교함으로 해외취업을 고려하고 있는 방사선사와 전공학생에게 기초정보를 제공하고자 한다. 카나다의 경우 1475 Edmonton Street, Prince George, BC, Canada에 있는 Prince George Resional Hospital, 호주의 경우 Commercial Road Melbourne 3004, Australia에 있는 Alfred Hospital, 한국의 경우 카나다 및 호주와 유사한 규모의 종합병원 방사선사를 대상으로 카나다는 2007년 8월 13일부터, 한국은 2007년 9월 10일부터, 호주는 2008년 8월 4일부터 각각 약 일주일간 방문하여 조사하여 다음과 같은 결과를 도출하였다. 1. 방사선사의 성별로 한국은 남자 18명(90%), 카나다와 호주는 여자가 각각 14명(73.7%), 25명(86.2%)으로 국가별 방사선사 구성의 성별 차이가 있음을 보여준다. 2. 직업을 선택할 때 가장 중요하게 생각하는 요소는 한국, 카나다, 호주 모두 '적성'이 가장 높게 나타났고, 그 다음으로 '보수'가 높게 나타났다. 3. 직업에 대한 가치에서 한국은 '경제적 자립', '남에게 인정받기 위하여', '사회적인 지위를 확보하기 위하여' 부분이 높게 나타났고 카나다와 호주는 '일 자체가 좋아서', '자아실현을 위하여', '삶의 의미를 느끼기 위하여', '다양한 사람들과 사귀기 위하여'가 높게 나타났다. 4. 직업에 대한 의견 중 '직업은 결혼만큼 중요한 것이다'에서 한국은 '그렇다', 카나다와 호주는 '그렇지 않다'가 높게 나타났다. 5. 한국, 카나다, 호주의 방사선사를 대상으로 직업의식을 비교한 결과 한국은 카나다와 호주에 비교하여 직업관련 의식이 낮은 수준을 보였다. 본 연구는 각 국가별 표본선정에 있어 현실적으로 조사 가능한 범위가 빈약하여 전체 방사선사 의견을 대표한다고 하기에는 한계점이 있으나 방사선사의 해외취업에 관심 있는 주요 국가를 비교하는데 의의가 있다고 본다. 【This study attempts to provide basic information on overseas employment to the radiological technologists and students majoring in radiology in Korea who consider the overseas employment by investigating the job consciousness for radiological technologists in Canada and Australia which have a high level of interest for overseas employment and want to compare their status with that of Korean radiological technologists. This study was performed by visiting hospitals such as Prince George Regional Hospital, 1475 Edmonton Street, Prince George, BC, Canada on August 13, 2007, Alfred Hospital, Commercial Road Melbourne 3004, Australia on August 4, 2008, and other Korea hospitals that show the similar scale as Canada and Australia on September 10, 2007. The results were summarized as follows : 1. Differences were observed in this sexual composition, such as 18 males (90%) in Korea, 14 females (73.7%) in Canada, and 25 females in Australia (86.2%). 2. The item of 'aptitude' which is one of the most important criteria, showed the highest level in Korea, Canada, and Australia, and the second most considered item was 'salary'. 3. In the values in jobs, the items of 'economic self-sufficiency', 'recognized by others', and 'establishing a social position' represented high levels in Korea, and the items of 'like the job itself', 'establishing self-actualization', 'feel the meaning of life', and 'make new friends' showed high levels in Canada and Australia. 4. Regarding the item of 'a job is important as much as a marriage', 'Yes' showed high level in Korea, and 'No' showed high levels in Canada and Australia. 5. Radiological technologists in Korea demonstrated a low level in the job consciousness compared to those of Canada and Australia. Although this study shows some limitations for showing whole idea of radiological technologists due to the lack of the scope in samples for each country as a practical manner, this study can be regarded significant to compare some countries that have interests in overseas employment.】
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.027 | 0.006 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".