MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2240942875

Combined rigid/deformable plate tectonic reconstructions for the Central Atlantic margins

2011· article· en· W2240942875 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
A. Adriasola Munoz, C. T. Glover, Jim Harris, Mike Goodrich, Lynne M. Hudson, Bridget E. Ady

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geophysical Studies Worldwide
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyPlate tectonicsContinental marginCrustSeismologyTectonicsContext (archaeology)RiftOceanic crustSeafloor spreadingContinental crustPassive marginCenozoicConvergent boundarySeismic tomographyPaleontologySubductionMantle (geology)Structural basin
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The exact location of the continent-ocean boundary (COB) at passive continental margins is difficult to define because of the similar physical properties of oceanic crust and highly extended continental crust, and the effect of igneous intrusions on the calculation of crustal thickness. The Iberian and Newfoundland conjugate margins are zones where anomalously large amounts of crustal extension have occurred, and are difficult to reconstruct in a global context using plate tectonic models based on rigid plates. A self-consistent global, plate tectonic model is presented here that incorporates stretching factors, deformable plates and scales deformation for the Cenozoic and Mesozoic for the entire Atlantic margin. Restoration to pre-rift geometries has been achieved by removal of plate ‘overlap’ of the deformed regions in the reconstructions, and is consistent with estimated stretching factors derived from deep seismic crustal studies across the conjugate margins.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.190
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.180
Teacher spread0.154 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeological and Geophysical Studies WorldwideFrench-language works237,207