Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction Hydrogenated amorphous silicon thin film transistors (a-Si:H TFTs) are widely used as switching elements in liquid crystal displays (LCDs), imaging arrays and page-width printers that employ the active matrix addressing architecture. These devices, however, suffer from the electrical instability, when a prolonged voltage stress is applied to the TFT gate. This instability appears as a threshold voltage shift and degradation in subthreshold slope. Metastability of amorphous silicon TFTs under DC bias stress has been of interest in previous research, but less attention has been paid to the instabilities induced by pulse bias stress [5][6]. The study of pulse bias induced metastability of a-Si TFTs provides insight for designing circuits that are less sensitive or insensitive to instability. The results allow use of appropriate techniques to compensate for metastability, leading to less degradation from normal operation and longer lifetime for large area electronic systems. The paper presents results on pulse bias induced metastability of several a- Si:H inverted-staggered TFTs fabricated in-house at the University of Waterloo Microelectronics Laboratory using a 260°C fully wet-etch process.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".