MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2241292533

STATUS OF NORTH AMERICAN LIGHT RAIL TRANSIT SYSTEMS: YEAR 2003 UPDATE

2000· article· en· W2241292533 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
John W Schumann

Bibliographic record

VenueTransportation Research E-Circular · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicTransport and Economic Policies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInterurbanLight rail transitLight railTransit (satellite)Public transportGeographyTransport engineeringRail transitTransit systemRegional sciencePolitical scienceEngineering
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

When the Transportation Research Board (TRB) sponsored its first light rail transit (LRT) conference in 1975, only remnants remained of North America’s once vast system of city streetcars and intercity, interurban electric railways. Totaling just 200 miles (320 km), these “legacy systems” of one to a few lines ran in seven U.S. cities and Toronto, Canada. Since 1975, there has been a rebirth of interest and activity in LRT, with such services operating now in 24 U.S. cities plus three each in Canada and Mexico. More are under construction, being designed or planned. This paper reports on the progress of U.S. and Canadian LRT projects since the last LRT conference was held in 2006.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.285
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTransportation Research E-CircularSame topicTransport and Economic PoliciesFrench-language works237,207