MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2241340652 · doi:10.1109/tia.2015.2470642

Online Loss-Minimization-Based Adaptive Flux Observer for Direct Torque and Flux Control of PMSM Drive

2015· article· en· W2241340652 on OpenAlexafffund
M. Nasir Uddin, HonBin Zou, F. Azevedo

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Industry Applications · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSensorless Control of Electric Motors
Canadian institutionsLakehead University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)Vector controlDirect torque controlObserver (physics)TorqueMinificationMRASEngineeringMagnetic fluxMachine controlSynchronous motorControl engineeringInduction motorComputer scienceControl (management)PhysicsMagnetic fieldVoltageElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a novel adaptive flux observer based direct torque and flux control (DTFC) of a permanent magnet synchronous motor (PMSM) drive. An online loss minimization algorithm (LMA) is developed to estimate the air-gap flux so that the motor operates at minimum loss condition while taking the general advantages of the DTFC scheme over the conventional vector control scheme. The proposed DTFC-based PMSM drive incorporating the LMA-based flux observer is implemented in real time using the DSP board DS1104 for a laboratory 5-hp motor. The performance of the proposed LMA-based DTFC control of the PMSM drive is tested in both simulation and experiment at different operating conditions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations70
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Industry ApplicationsSame topicSensorless Control of Electric MotorsFrench-language works237,207