MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2241559310

Constructing Aboriginal and Dalit Women's Subjectivity and Making 'Difference' Speak: An Illustration through the Writings of Jackie Huggins, Kumud Pawde and Bama

2010· article· en· W2241559310 on OpenAlex
Maria Preethi Srinivasan

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueSoutherly · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicPostcolonial and Cultural Literary Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSubjectivityBamaGender studiesSociologyColonialismFeminismSubject (documents)FacilitatorIntersection (aeronautics)HistoryPsychologyPhilosophyEpistemologySocial psychologyGeographyCartography
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The present study attempts an examination of the construction of 'the subject' in the life-writings of Australian Aboriginal writer Jackie Huggins and the Indian Dalit writers Bama and Kumud Pawde. Prior to this venture, I presented a similar transnational study of Bama's Sangati and First Nations Canadian writer Lee Maracle's I Am Woman. Both texts are exclusively about the women of their respective commu - nities. The paper highlighted the points of intersection and difference in these two women's reflections on the hegemonies in their respective situations, namely of colonialism and casteism. Caren Kaplan and Inderpal Grewal's theory of transnational feminism proved to be an excellent facilitator for a comparative study of the writings and expe - riences of women as removed in time and space as the writers Lee Maracle and Bama.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.342
Threshold uncertainty score0.429

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it