MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2241654553 · doi:10.1049/el.2015.3064

Simple sampling clock synchronisation scheme for reduced‐guard‐interval coherent optical OFDM systems

2015· article· en· W2241654553 on OpenAlex
Oluyemi Omomukuyo, Deyuan Chang, Octavia A. Dobre, R. Venkatesan, Telex M. N. Ngatched

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueElectronics Letters · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicOptical Network Technologies
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
FundersAtlantic Canada Opportunities AgencyResearch and Development Corporation of Newfoundland and Labrador
KeywordsGuard intervalOrthogonal frequency-division multiplexingComputer scienceElectronic engineeringAlgorithmInterpolation (computer graphics)Quadrature amplitude modulationMathematicsChannel (broadcasting)Bit error rateTelecommunicationsEngineeringDecoding methodsFrame (networking)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A simple data‐aided scheme for sampling clock synchronisation in reduced‐guard‐interval coherent optical OFDM (RGI‐CO‐OFDM) systems is proposed. In the proposed scheme, the sampling clock offset (SCO) is estimated by using the training symbols reserved for channel estimation, thus avoiding extra training overhead. The SCO is then compensated by resampling, using a time‐domain interpolation filter. The feasibility of the proposed scheme is demonstrated by means of numerical simulations in a 32 Gbaud 16‐QAM dual‐polarisation RGI‐CO‐OFDM system.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.279
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it