MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2241673611 · doi:10.1139/p08-029

Theory of surface light-induced drift with forced specularity

2008· article· en· W2241673611 on OpenAlexfundvenueno aff
F. O. Goodman

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Physics · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicCold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein Condensates
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsSpecularityPhysicsSurface (topology)ScatteringMechanicsOpticsGeometryMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Waxman has recently proposed new mechanisms for surface light-induced drift (SLID), which he called “SLID with forced specularity” (christened SLIDWFS here). SLIDWFS was proposed for its potential use in modelling several important physical processes; examples are selective control of spatial distributions of gases, including isotope separation, probing the molecule-surface interaction potential in gas-surface scattering, heterogeneous chemical reactions in catalysis, and laser cooling. Waxman’s cell geometry consisted of a single flat plate; the usual approximations were made in the analysis, and substantial effects (larger than in ordinary SLID) were reported. In the present contribution, we study the more realistic double-flat-plate and circular-cylindrical geometries. We get exact analytical solutions to the model rate equations, with results quite different from Waxman’s. For example, for circular-cylindrical geometry, which is clearly preferable in ordinary SLID, we predict a negligible SLIDWFS effect.PACS Nos.: 05.60.–k, 34.35.+a, 34.50.Rk

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.023

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.003
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.201
Teacher spread0.184 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2008
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of PhysicsSame topicCold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein CondensatesFrench-language works237,207