MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2241701891 · doi:10.2118/174424-ms

Evaluation of Diffusion of Light Hydrocarbon Solvents in Bitumen

2015· article· en· W2241701891 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueSPE Canada Heavy Oil Technical Conference · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicPetroleum Processing and Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaAlberta InnovatesCMG Reservoir Simulation FoundationSuncor Energy Incorporated
KeywordsAsphaltSolventPropaneViscosityHydrocarbonTolueneMass transferDiffusionMixing (physics)Phase (matter)Hydrocarbon mixturesChemistryChemical engineeringLight crude oilMaterials scienceThermodynamicsPetroleum engineeringOrganic chemistryChromatographyComposite materialGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Solvent-based processes are often used as potential recovery agents in bitumen systems, with and without the addition of heat to the solvent. Solvents can sometimes be applied as a liquid phase, during SAGD start-up operations or processes aimed at developing injectivity into the oil. Light hydrocarbon liquids are traditionally tested for this application. Solvent injection may also occur in a vapour state and its objective is to reduce oil viscosity and improve mobility of bitumen under low temperatures <100°C. In general, hydrocarbon solvents such as propane are often used for this application. The objective of this study is to conduct CT-based measurement of static mixing of bitumen and both liquid and vapour phase solvents, and to quantify some of the time-dependent changes that occur during solvent mixing with bitumen. Diffusion experiments have been conducted with propane and DME (vapour phase) and with propane, DME, pentane and toluene (liquid phase) solvent systems. Solvents are mixed with medium viscosity Peace River bitumen and high viscosity Grosmont bitumen. The Tests are run under constant pressure and temperature, and Computer-Assisted Tomography (CT) is used to monitor mass transfer of solvent into oil as a function of time. The outcome of this study is measurements of mass transfer rates of solvent into oil, and the degree of oil phase swelling during the tests. During solvent injection processes in the field, the rate of mixing is a key parameter that will help in deciding which solvent is optimal for different processes. This study focuses on the rate of solvent mixing with oil. In vapour phase solvent systems, the analysis of the CT images allows for an understanding of the impact of oil phase swelling on the effective rate of penetration of solvent into oil. Overall, the test data provided in this work demonstrates that DME mixes into oil faster than other solvents, and leads to more swelling in a vapour solvent-bitumen system. The analysis of CT data provides an understanding of concentration-dependent diffusion coefficients and limitations from predicting mass transfer using constant coefficients in liquid and vapour solvent systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.225
Threshold uncertainty score0.835

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it