MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Efficacy and compliance of small-bore chest tube insertion and pleurodesis protocols for the treatment of malignant pleural effusions

2007· article· en· W2241776649 on OpenAlexaffabout
Rachel Goodwin, M. Neil Reaume, V Gallant, Gail Macartney, Donna E. Maziak, Fred Matzinger, S. Gertler

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPleural and Pulmonary Diseases
Canadian institutionsOttawa HospitalHealth Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPleurodesisMedicineChest tubePneumothoraxSurgeryMalignant pleural effusionChest painPleural effusionCatheterThoracoscopyAnesthesia

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

19575 Background: Small-bore chest tubes are now recognized as a safe and effective alternative to large-bore catheter chest tubes for the treatment of malignant pleural effusions (MPEs). The Ottawa Hospital (TOH) developed protocols for insertion and pleurodesis to maximize efficiency and minimize complications. Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and compliance of small-bore chest tube insertion and pleurodesis protocols for the treatment of MPEs. Methods: Retrospective chart review of TOH medical oncology inpatients treated for a MPE using our small-bore chest tube insertion and pleurodesis protocols from February 2003 to May 2004. Outcomes reviewed included deviations from protocol (major and minor), proportion of patients proceeding to pleurodesis and efficacy at six weeks, complications, as well as length of hospital stay. Results: One-hundred and fourteen potential cases were identified, of those 78 small-bore chest tubes were inserted into 72 patients. Major deviations from the chest tube protocol occurred in 21 patients (27%) who lacked microbiological analysis of their pleural fluid. Major complications of tube insertion occurred in ten patients (13%) who developed pulmonary infections and two patients (2.5%) who developed a significant pneumothorax. Of the 78 tube insertions, 24 cases went on to pleurodesis. Major deviations from our pleurodesis protocol occurred in five patients (2.1%) who failed to have a chest xray twenty-four hours prior to pleurodesis. The most common complication post pleurodesis was pain with seven of 24 patients (29%) rating their pain as severe. Fifteen of the 24 patients (63%) had fluid reaccumulation within six-weeks post pleurodesis. Median length of stay for patients without pleurodesis versus those with pleurodesis was 14.5 and 16.0 days, respectively. Conclusions: Our preliminary data suggests that chest tube insertion and pleurodesis protocols have good compliance rates with low rates of complications. Only a minority of patients were able to proceed to pleurodesis and long term control of effusion occurs in less than half of patients in this subgroup. As well, pain control at the time of pleurodesis was not adequate in one third of patients with the current protocol. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.011
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.054
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.060

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0110.054
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.322
GPT teacher head0.502
Teacher spread0.179 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical OncologySame topicPleural and Pulmonary DiseasesFrench-language works237,207