The juvenile delinquent under the age of twelve : a study of fifty-seven male juvenile delinquents known to the Halifax District Office of the Department of Public Welfare as of March 31, 1960
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This thesis is one of sixteen based on a group study of one hundred and seventy•s1x delinquents known to the Halifax District Office of the Department of ub.Uo Welfare and the Nova Scotia School for Boys at Shelburne.In the grou~ study, primary data were obtained from the , case rec.ords or these juven11 delinquent s.Secondary data were obtained from 1nterv1ews w1 th p;rofessional p.ersons 1n the community and li t erature 1n the fields of social wo:rk, psychiatry --.d psychology \las used as background material.The subject or th!.s thesis 1s delinquent boy vho were under the age of twelve at the time of the opening or the case~ The researcher made a detailed tudy of the family background, the emotional an, enta.lstatus and the school expe~ience of these tittyseven boys.Many of the child.renstudied were victims or broken and unstable homes resu.lting in emotional deprivation of tbe child.School achievement of a number of these children was below average.Jn $om!::;, but not all cases this could be attributed to low intelligence., the wx-iter concluded that there was a pressing community need !or improved services for helping children with special needs, espeeially the emotionally disturbed and t he mentally retarded.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".