Analyse de la gestion des résidus de la construction, rénovation et démolition au Québec
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La gestion des résidus de construction, rénovation et démolition dans l’ensemble des MRC du Québec est fortement influencée par la mise en place de la Politique québécoise de la gestion des matières résiduelles du Québec 1998-2008. Celle-ci prévoyait la mise en valeur de 60 % des résidus de CRD de la province. Cette politique, jumelée à celle de la disparition progressive des Dépôts de matériaux secs prévue dans le Règlement sur l’élimination et l’incinération des matières résiduelles, aura eu des répercussions sur l’offre de service de la récupération. Sans oublier l’impact indéniable qu’elles ont eu sur les performances des infrastructures d’élimination, de récupération et de recyclage présentes dans les 17 régions administratives du Québec. Ces modifications du cadre législatif poussent les acteurs de ce milieu à trouver des solutions de rechange afin de diversifier leurs débouchés mais surtout d’assurer leur survie économique.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".