MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2241999977

The Church of the third millenium. An exercise in theological and canonical imagination: in praise of communio

2004· article· en· W2241999977 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueStudia canonica · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicTheology and Canon Law Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhilosophyPraiseHumanitiesArtLiterature
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

L'Eglise est dans son etat optimal lorsque la communia est pleinement exercee par tous ses membres. La communia est une realite interne invisible creee par l'Esprit a travers les sacrements. Une realite interne exige des structures externes visibles. C'est a partir des sacrements d'initiation que s'eleve la premiere et toute marquante communia generale des fideles. C'est a partir du sacrement de l'ordre que s'eleve la communia du « clerge ». C'est a partir du sacrement de mariage que s'eleve la communia de l'« Eglise domestique ». Et c'est a partir des charismes librement accordes que s'eleve la communia des instituts religieux. Le mieux et le plus que l'Eglise peut faire pour promouvoir l'union des Eglises chretiennes est d'etre entierement une communia - un paradigme de conception divine. L'oeuvre oecumenique des Eglises separees est un ministere de guerison; son but est de restaurer et reparer la communia interieurement dechiree de l'Eglise universelle du Christ.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.937
Threshold uncertainty score0.991

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it