MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2241999977

The Church of the third millenium. An exercise in theological and canonical imagination: in praise of communio

2004· article· en· W2241999977 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Ladislas Örsy

Bibliographic record

VenueStudia canonica · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicTheology and Canon Law Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhilosophyPraiseHumanitiesArtLiterature
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

L'Eglise est dans son etat optimal lorsque la communia est pleinement exercee par tous ses membres. La communia est une realite interne invisible creee par l'Esprit a travers les sacrements. Une realite interne exige des structures externes visibles. C'est a partir des sacrements d'initiation que s'eleve la premiere et toute marquante communia generale des fideles. C'est a partir du sacrement de l'ordre que s'eleve la communia du « clerge ». C'est a partir du sacrement de mariage que s'eleve la communia de l'« Eglise domestique ». Et c'est a partir des charismes librement accordes que s'eleve la communia des instituts religieux. Le mieux et le plus que l'Eglise peut faire pour promouvoir l'union des Eglises chretiennes est d'etre entierement une communia - un paradigme de conception divine. L'oeuvre oecumenique des Eglises separees est un ministere de guerison; son but est de restaurer et reparer la communia interieurement dechiree de l'Eglise universelle du Christ.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.027
Threshold uncertainty score0.053

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0120.015
Scholarly communication0.0050.002
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0020.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStudia canonicaSame topicTheology and Canon Law StudiesFrench-language works237,207