MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2242018478 · doi:10.7202/1034094ar

Les libellules (Odonata) de Gatineau, Québec, d’hier à aujourd’hui

2015· article· fr· W2242018478 on OpenAlexafffundvenueabout
Caroline Piché, Raymond Hutchinson

Bibliographic record

VenueLe Naturaliste canadien · 2015
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicFreshwater macroinvertebrate diversity and ecology
Canadian institutionsCanadian Parks and Wilderness Society
FundersAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
KeywordsForestryLibellulidaeGeographyHumanitiesOdonataArtEcologyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Gatineau, 4 e ville en importance au Québec, se situe au sud-ouest de la province, en bordure de la rivière des Outaouais. On y trouve au moins 87 espèces de libellules. Un inventaire fait en 2013 et 2014 a permis de documenter la constance, l’abondance relative et les indices de reproduction pour 82 d’entre elles. La comparaison des résultats avec l’odonatofaune historique (1886-1935) a révélé qu’au moins 90 % des espèces s’étaient maintenues depuis le tournant du 20 e siècle. Huit espèces spécialistes, associées aux ruisseaux, aux rivières ou aux milieux humides temporaires pourraient cependant avoir décliné ou disparu. En revanche, au moins 7 espèces généralistes, pionnières et associées aux eaux stagnantes, toutes de la famille des Libellulidae à l’exception d’une Coenagrionide, y sont en expansion. Ces changements de l’odonatofaune pourraient être attribuables à l’étalement urbain. Les libellules, indicatrices de changements environnementaux, peuvent être facilement observées et surveillées dans le cadre de projets de science citoyenne.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.149
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2015
Admission routes4
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLe Naturaliste canadienSame topicFreshwater macroinvertebrate diversity and ecologyFrench-language works237,207