Les libellules (Odonata) de Gatineau, Québec, d’hier à aujourd’hui
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Gatineau, 4eville en importance au Québec, se situe au sud-ouest de la province, en bordure de la rivière des Outaouais. On y trouve au moins 87 espèces de libellules. Un inventaire fait en 2013 et 2014 a permis de documenter la constance, l’abondance relative et les indices de reproduction pour 82 d’entre elles. La comparaison des résultats avec l’odonatofaune historique (1886-1935) a révélé qu’au moins 90 % des espèces s’étaient maintenues depuis le tournant du 20esiècle. Huit espèces spécialistes, associées aux ruisseaux, aux rivières ou aux milieux humides temporaires pourraient cependant avoir décliné ou disparu. En revanche, au moins 7 espèces généralistes, pionnières et associées aux eaux stagnantes, toutes de la famille des Libellulidae à l’exception d’une Coenagrionide, y sont en expansion. Ces changements de l’odonatofaune pourraient être attribuables à l’étalement urbain. Les libellules, indicatrices de changements environnementaux, peuvent être facilement observées et surveillées dans le cadre de projets de science citoyenne.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".