MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2242043804 · doi:10.14447/jnmes.v15i4.39

Nanostructured OMO type Manganese Oxide – as Novel Support for Palladium towards Electrooxidation of Methanol and Ethylene Glycol

2012· article· en· W2242043804 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Ramanujam Kannan, K. Karunakaran, Samuel Vasanthkumar

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of New Materials for Electrochemical Systems · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicElectrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEthylene glycolCatalysisMethanolPalladiumMaterials scienceManganeseNanocompositeScanning electron microscopeMetalElectrochemistryNuclear chemistryInorganic chemistryOxideChemistryMetallurgyNanotechnologyElectrodeOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Octahedral molecular sieve type manganese oxide (OMO) was synthesized by the ultra sonic assisted hydrothermal method, and was subsequently used as supportive material for palladium (Pd) metal towards the electrooxidation of methanol and ethylene glycol. The Pd nanoparticles were coated on the OMO by insitu reduction method. Low quantity of 5% Pd metal was used and the electrocatalytic activity was studied. The prepared OMO and the OMO/Pd nanocomposite were characterized by powder X–ray diffractogram (XRD), Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM), Energy dispersive X–ray spectroscopy (EDS) and electrochemical methods. These studies demonstrated that the OMO can act as a good catalyst supporting material. The OMO helps to enhance the catalytic activity of Pd metal by supplying the active oxygen, which is extracted from the electrolytic solution. The electrooxidation of EG shows improved catalytic activity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.000
Threshold uncertainty score0.001

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of New Materials for Electrochemical SystemsSame topicElectrocatalysts for Energy ConversionFrench-language works237,207