MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2242757997

[논문] 外國導入 아시아틱 나리 系統의 生長 및 開花 特性

2002· article· ko· W2242757997 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
김희준, 김정만, 최동칠, 최정식, 최영근, 박병모

Bibliographic record

Venue화훼연구 · 2002
Typearticle
Languageko
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicEcology and Conservation Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCartonArtGeographyEngineering
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

나리 육종의 기초를 마련하기 위하여 도입 품종에 대한 특정을 조사하였다. Crimson Pixie, Masai, Massa, Rodrigo, Toronto는 14일만에 출아되어 출아기가 가장 빨랐으며, Carton, Mona, Sole Mio 품종은 28일 만에 출아되어 출아기가 가장 늦었다. Rodrigo 품종이 56일로 개화가 가장 빨랐고, Marrakech 품종은 82일로 가장 늦게 개화되였다. 수집 71종 중 조생종 16종, 중생종 49종, 만생종6종으로 조사되였고 꽃잎에 반점이 없는 품종은 19종, 반점이 있는 품종은 52종으로나타났다.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.176
Threshold uncertainty score0.996

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.067
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.151 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue화훼연구Same topicEcology and Conservation StudiesFrench-language works237,207