Longitudinal Assessment of Left and Right Myocardial Function in Preterm Infants Using Strain and Strain Rate Imaging
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: There is a paucity of longitudinal data on left ventricular (LV) and right ventricular (RV) function in preterm infants of less than 29 weeks' gestation. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to describe changes in tissue Doppler-derived basal longitudinal strain (BLS) and systolic (SRs), early (SRe) and late (SRa) diastolic strain rates in extremely premature infants from birth to 36 weeks postmenstrual age (PMA). METHODS: Echocardiographic assessments were carried out on days 1, 2, 5-7 and at 36 weeks PMA. We assessed the following associations: correlation with systemic vascular resistance (SVR) on day 1, influence of a patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) during days 5-7, and the effect of chronic lung disease (CLD). RESULTS: In total, 105 infants with a median gestation of 27.1 weeks (IQR 26.0-28.1) and a birthweight of 965 g (IQR 785-1,153) were included. There was an increase in most of the measurements across the four time points. On day 1, there was a weak negative correlation between SVR and LV BLS (r = -0.3, p = 0.01), SVR and septal BLS (r = -0.4, p < 0.001) and SVR and LV SRe (r = -0.4, p = 0.005). On days 5-7, infants with a PDA >1.5 mm had higher LV BLS [-13.0 (2.4) vs. -11.9 (1.9)%, p = 0.03]. At 36 weeks, infants with CLD (n = 28/47) had lower RV BLS [-26.4 (5.0) vs. -30.7 (5.5)%, p = 0.01] and lower RV SRa [4.2 (1.3) vs. 5.3 (1.9) s-1, p = 0.04]. CONCLUSION: Myocardial function undergoes important longitudinal changes in preterm infants. Left heart strain measurements appear to be weakly influenced by changes in preload and afterload. CLD appears to leave a negative impact on RV function.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".