Nutrient content of barley and red clover as influenced by application of compost.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Compost was made from source-separated municipal waste with or without disposable diapers included in the compostable waste stream. The composts were applied prior to planting of barley in a barley - red clover - potato rotation on a Charlottetown fine sandy loam soil. A control which did not receive compost was included in the randomized complete block experiments with four replications at each of the seven locations. Nutrient levels in the compost were determined by sampling compost material delivered to each location prior to, and during, the spreading operation. Nutrient levels in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) and red clover (Trifolium pratense L.) tissue were determined. Some nutrients were found at slightly higher concentrations in the compost made from the waste stream containing disposable diapers than from the waste stream where disposable diapers were excluded. Nutrient levels in barley and red clover from compost-treated plots were generally higher than from the untreated plots. The two compost sources generally produced barley and clover with similar nutrient levels.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".