MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2243504962 · doi:10.4000/peme.9930

Marshall McLuhan : un spectre hante-t-il les études médiévales canadiennes ?

2016· article· fr· W2243504962 on OpenAlexaffabout
Patrick W. Moran

Bibliographic record

VenuePerspectives médiévales · 2016
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMedia, Communication, and Education
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophyArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cet article revient sur les travaux de Marshall McLuhan et sur leur influence diffuse sur les études médiévales, au Canada et ailleurs. Le paradigme médiatique formulé par McLuhan lui permet, dans La Galaxie Gutenberg, de dépeindre un Moyen Âge transitionnel, une civilisation mixte qui tend vers une domination massive des médias visuels et vers l’invention de l’imprimerie, mais a encore un pied fermement ancré dans le paysage médiatique antérieur, celui de l’ouïe et de la synesthésie. L’article examine la valeur heuristique des propositions formulées par McLuhan, ainsi que leur influence sur le discours médiéviste canadien, depuis la lecture critique de Paul Zumthor au début des années 1980 jusqu’aux approches actuelles fondées dans le renouveau philologique et codicologique de la fin du xxe siècle et du début du xxie.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.680
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.061
GPT teacher head0.314
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePerspectives médiévalesSame topicMedia, Communication, and EducationFrench-language works237,207