Marshall McLuhan : un spectre hante-t-il les études médiévales canadiennes ?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article revient sur les travaux de Marshall McLuhan et sur leur influence diffuse sur les études médiévales, au Canada et ailleurs. Le paradigme médiatique formulé par McLuhan lui permet, dans La Galaxie Gutenberg, de dépeindre un Moyen Âge transitionnel, une civilisation mixte qui tend vers une domination massive des médias visuels et vers l’invention de l’imprimerie, mais a encore un pied fermement ancré dans le paysage médiatique antérieur, celui de l’ouïe et de la synesthésie. L’article examine la valeur heuristique des propositions formulées par McLuhan, ainsi que leur influence sur le discours médiéviste canadien, depuis la lecture critique de Paul Zumthor au début des années 1980 jusqu’aux approches actuelles fondées dans le renouveau philologique et codicologique de la fin du xxe siècle et du début du xxie.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.012 | 0.020 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.007 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".