MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2243550504

Development of a New Ice-Ocean Prediction System for the Northwest Atlantic

2009· article· en· W2243550504 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
M. Guarracino, Fred Dupont, Fraser Davidson, Charles G. Hannah, A. W. Ratsimandresy

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the International Conference on Port and Ocean Engineering Under Arctic Conditions · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicArctic and Antarctic ice dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOceanographySea iceBayGeologyClimatologyArctic ice packAntarctic sea iceIce shelfCryosphere
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Fisheries and Oceans Canada is developing a comprehensive ocean-ice prediction system for the Northwest Atlantic in conjunction with a larger initiative to develop an operational coupled atmosphere-ice-ocean prediction capability for Canada. For the East Coast of Canada, a preoperational modelling system called C-NOOFS (Canada Newfoundland Operational Ocean Forecast System) is being developed based on the NEMO (Nucleus for European Modelling of the Ocean) modelling system. The system covers the seasonally ice-covered areas from Baffin Bay in the north to the Gulf of St. Lawrence in the south. The strengths of the simulations include: the timing of the maximum southwards extent of the sea ice off Newfoundland; the fact that off Labrador the sea ice largely restricted to the shelf; that the ice in the Gulf of St. Lawrence does not extend onto the Scotian Shelf; and the solution in Hudson Bay is qualitatively reasonable. The primary weaknesses are that south of 55⁰ N the simulated ice concentrations are much smaller and the ice thicknesses are thinner than are observed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.374
Threshold uncertainty score0.744

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the International Conference on Port and Ocean Engineering Under Arctic ConditionsSame topicArctic and Antarctic ice dynamicsFrench-language works237,207