MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2243735628

Queueing model for heterogeneous opportunistic spectrum access

2014· article· en· W2243735628 on OpenAlexaff
Brunilde Sansò, Jean‐François Frigon, Arash Azarfar

Bibliographic record

VenueLes Cahiers du GERAD · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCognitive Radio Networks and Spectrum Sensing
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceQueueing theoryMarkov chainQueueMarkov processLayered queueing networkService (business)Markov modelComputer networkMathematical optimizationReal-time computingMathematicsStatistics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we propose a queueing model to analyze the performance of an opportunistic spectrum access (OSA) system with service interruptions operating over heterogeneous channels in which the service transmission rate and the service interruption rate after the transmission is resumed are generally different than their value prior to the interruption. We first propose Markov chain models to analyze this system under memoryless service time and availability periods. Based on simplification assumptions, we also provide an analytical z-Transform analysis of the Markov models. The Markov model and approximations are validated with accurate system simulations. We also provide numerical results illustrating the non-convex relations between the traffic metrics and system parameters and that the proposed models are essential for optimal OSA network planning and operation. We further analyze and discuss the OSA queuing model for general distribution of service time and availability periods. The analytical and simulation results indicate that for usual system parameters, the queue average occupancy is similar for different distributions of service time and availability periods and that the memoryless Markov models can be used to accurately predict the heterogeneous OSA system traffic performance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.933
Threshold uncertainty score0.871

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLes Cahiers du GERADSame topicCognitive Radio Networks and Spectrum SensingFrench-language works237,207