MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2243812048 · doi:10.1109/camsap.2015.7383805

Asymptotically optimal narrowband signal detection using uniform linear array antenna

2015· article· en· W2243812048 on OpenAlexaff
Ali Ghobadzadeh, Saeed Gazor

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicDirection-of-Arrival Estimation Techniques
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNarrowbandEstimatorAlgorithmMathematicsLikelihood-ratio testDirection of arrivalOutlierEstimation theoryStatisticsGaussian noiseDetection theoryDetectorComputer scienceAntenna (radio)Telecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper addresses the detection of a narrowband signal in Gaussian noise with unknown parameters. Assuming unknown direction-of-arrival (DoA), amplitude, frequency, phase and noise variance, two Separating Function Estimation Tests (SFETs) and a Generalized Likelihood Ratio Test (GLRT) are proposed to detect the signal. These SFETs are estimates of a proposed Separating Function (SF). This proposed SF provides asymptotically optimal detectors using Maximum Likelihood Estimation (MLE) and is derived by the decomposition of Fisher information function of the induced maximal invariant. We propose two estimators MLE and Outlier Processed MLE (OPMLE) for estimation of the SF. It is shown that, the MLE of frequency and DoA are obtained by an exhaustive search to maximize the absolute of the two-dimensional discrete Fourier transform (DFT) of the received signals. We propose OP-MLE as an MLE based estimator by first eliminating the outliers from the DFT of the received signal using a pre-estimation of DoA and frequency. The simulation results show that the omission of outliers results in considerable improvement. Similarly, the resulting SFET using OP-MLE provides a higher probability of detection comparing with SFET using MLE and GLRT.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicDirection-of-Arrival Estimation TechniquesFrench-language works237,207