MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2243906454

CIAN - Cell Imaging and Analysis Network at the Biology Department of McGill University

2010· article· en· W2243906454 on OpenAlexaffabout
Judith Lacoste, Guillaume Lesage, Steven Bunnell, Hee-Dong Han, Elke Küster-Schöck

Bibliographic record

VenuePubMed Central · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicResearch Data Management Practices
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceService (business)AutomationProteomicsComputational biologyBiologyEngineeringBiochemistry
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

CF-31 The Cell Imaging and Analysis Network (CIAN) provides services and tools to researchers in the field of cell biology from within or outside Montreal's McGill University community. CIAN is composed of six scientific platforms: Cell Imaging (confocal and fluorescence microscopy), Proteomics (2-D protein gel electrophoresis and DiGE, fluorescent protein analysis), Automation and High throughput screening (Pinning robot and liquid handler), Protein Expression for Antibody Production, Genomics (real-time PCR), and Data storage and analysis (cluster, server, and workstations). Users submit project proposals, and can obtain training and consultation in any aspect of the facility, or initiate projects with the full-service platforms. CIAN is designed to facilitate training, enhance interactions, as well as share and maintain resources and expertise.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.188
Threshold uncertainty score0.524

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.004
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0050.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1570.056

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePubMed CentralSame topicResearch Data Management PracticesFrench-language works237,207