MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2244035215 · doi:10.1139/cjp-2013-0711

Method to enhance traffic capacity for two-layer complex networks

2014· article· en· W2244035215 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Shuai Zhang, Mangui Liang, Hui‐Jia Li

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Physics · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicComplex Network Analysis Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsComputer networkTopology (electrical circuits)Network packetRouting (electronic design automation)Layer (electronics)Network layerPath (computing)Betweenness centralityDistributed computingShortest path problemRouting protocolComputer sciencePhysicsTheoretical computer scienceNanotechnology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The study of traffic dynamics on multilayered networks is a hot issue, where the network topology is composed of two layers of subnetworks, such as wired–wireless networks and peer-to-peer networks. Virtual links on the logical layer can be changed or constructed easily, and therefore the topological structure of the upper logical layer can be efficiently constructed by a link removal strategy. In this paper, edges linking to nodes with large betweenness will be removed. The structure of the upper-layer network can be optimized freely based on our method. Simulation results show that for both shortest path routing strategy and efficient routing strategy, the traffic capacity of two-layer networks is significantly improved. In addition, the average transmission time of packets and the average path length are also investigated in this paper.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.315
Teacher spread0.284 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations31
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of PhysicsSame topicComplex Network Analysis TechniquesFrench-language works237,207