MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2244263452 · doi:10.25071/1496-4813.29880

The Premiere of L'Annonce faite à Marie in the Context of Heightened Interest in the Middle Ages and Jeanne d'Arc

2006· article· fr· W2244263452 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Carolyn Snipes-Hoyt

Bibliographic record

VenuePaul Claudel Papers a journal of the Paul Claudel Society · 2006
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicRenaissance Literature and Culture
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArc (geometry)Context (archaeology)HumanitiesHistoryArtArchaeologyEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

UnionCollege T Ln 1977, the year that Claudel's LAnnonce faite d Marie premiered, was the same year the five hundredth anniversary of Jeanne d'Arc's birth was celebrated in France.Given the height- ened interest in the Middle Ages that occurred in rhe late nineteenth-century, it would make sense to consider the play from the angle of its medieval setting and its featuring of Jeanne d'Arc in Act III, a significant moment in the plot.The setting of this play is not the "real" Middle Ages in decline, but rather a conventional fifteenth century, as stated in the stage directions at the beginning of the "Premibre version": "Tout le drame se passe d la fin d'un Moyen Age de convention, tel que les pobtes du Moyen Age pouvaient se figurer I'antiquit6" (lt).tEvents and historical figures are mentioned whose dates barely overlap, if at all.An early reference in the play (Act I, scene 1) brings together the French Dauphin as child (bom in 1403 and future Charles VII), Henry V of England (1387-1477), and the Great Schism, which ended inl4I7, whenJeanne d'Arc was about five years old, Charles fourteen, and Henry thirty-hardly an infant:2 A la place du Roi nous avons deux enfants.IJun Anglais, dans son tle, Et I'autre si petit qu'on ne le voit plus, entre les roseaux de la Loire.A la place du Pape, nous en avons trois et h la place de Rome, je ne sais quel concile en Suisse.(30)3 Volume IV

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.035
Threshold uncertainty score0.070

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0110.007
Scholarly communication0.0070.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0030.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePaul Claudel Papers a journal of the Paul Claudel SocietySame topicRenaissance Literature and CultureFrench-language works237,207