Bibliographic record
Abstract
Discussion of the significance of the Eureka Stockade is too often limited to the political changes that occurred within colonial Victoria in the aftermath of the violence at Ballarat. However, as Anne Beggs-Sunter noted in the previous article, the Eureka rebellion of 1854, with its trademark, the 'Southern Cross', has long been an inspiration for struggles against exploitation, oppression and imperialism. The Eureka flag that was hoisted above Bakery Hill, beneath which the militant miners swore their liberty oath, was designed by the Canadian, Charlie Ross. It was inspired by banners raised during the Canadian Rebellions of 1837-1839, and was sewn by women of the Ballarat goldfields. During the attack of 3 December 1854 it was torn down, trampled on and hacked by redcoats and police. The tattered fabric was retained in the private possession of a policeman's family for the next forty years, until it was donated to the Ballarat Art Gallery in 1895, where it remained in relative obscurity for over one hundred years. But the memory of the Eureka rebellion and the Southern Cross flag have since been adopted during critical moments in Australia's history by those defending their liberties or seeking new directions for the nation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.012 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".