MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2244602797

Recent Books about Rapanui [Book Review]

2009· article· en· W2244602797 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Grant McCall

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Polynesian Society · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPacific and Southeast Asian Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArt historyArtHumanitiesHistorySolitudeCartographyGeography
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Review(s) of: El sueno imposible de Antoni Pujador (1948-1993), by Amoros I Gonell, Francesc: Prologue by Josep A. Pujante. Barcelona: Sirpus, 2006. 278 pp., drawings, maps, photographs. n.p. Review(s) of: Island at the End of the World. The Turbulent History of Easter Island, by Fischer, Steven Roger, London: Reaktion Books. 2005. 304 pp. US$24.95, UK 14.95. Review(s) of: Inventing 'Easter Island', by Haun, Beverley, Toronto: University of Toronto Press. 2008. xxii + 332 pp. CA$45 (cloth); CA$35 (paper). Review(s) of: Rapa Nui: Eine Liebe auf der Osterinsel, by Pauly, Stephanie, Munich: Droemer/Knaur. 2004. 344 pp. 9.90. Review(s) of: Les evades de l'ile de Paques. Loin du Chili, vers Tahiti, by Peteuil, Marie-Francoise, (1944-1958). Paris: L'Harmattan. 2004. 270 pp. 23 (paper). Review(s) of: 1000 anos en Rapa Nui. Arqueologia del asentamiento, by Vargas, Patricia, Claudio Cristino and Roberto Izaurieta, Santiago de Chile: Editorial Universitaria, Instituto de Estudios Isla de Pascua. 2006. 426 pp., drawings, maps, photographs. US$39 (paper). Review(s) of: Dario, Life and Solitude in Easter Island, by Verdugo-Binimelis, Bloomington and Central Milton Keynes: Author-House. 2007. 119 pp., maps, photographs. UK 7.90 (paper), UK 12.30 (cloth). Includes references.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.142
Threshold uncertainty score0.473

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0050.009
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0050.003
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1420.099

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.301
Teacher spread0.283 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Polynesian SocietySame topicPacific and Southeast Asian StudiesFrench-language works237,207