MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2244797868

STUDY OF EMULSION POLYMERIZATION OF ACRYLATES WITH A HYPERBRANCHED POLYMER TERMINATED BY UNSATURATED DOUBLE BONDS

2007· article· en· W2244797868 on OpenAlexaff
Tang Minfeng, Fan Xiao-dong, Qingfa Si, Xiang Liu, Yuyang Liu

Bibliographic record

VenueActa Polymerica Sinica · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicDendrimers and Hyperbranched Polymers
Canadian institutionsScience North
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCopolymerEmulsion polymerizationPolymer chemistryPolymerizationMaterials scienceMonomerPolymerMethyl methacrylateAcrylateButyl acrylateDouble bondEmulsionChemical engineeringComposite material
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A hyperbranched polymer terminated by unsaturated double bonds (HBS) was synthesized and applied in emulsion copolymerization of acrylic monomers,butyl acrylate and methyl methacrylate.The polymerization mechanism,properties of the copolymers and the influence of HBS on the crosslinking structure of copolymers were investigated.The results showed that the acrylates emulsion polymerization process in the presence of HBS was stable,and crosslinked latex particles with average diameter less than 100 nm were obtained.FT-IR measurements of the latex copolymers also showed that the unsaturated terminal groups of HBS are all accessible to polymerization without trapping inside the hyperbranched macromolecular structure,and thus,the polymer networks in which HBS act as multi-arms crosslink points come into being.The emulsion polymerization rate and thermal stablity of the latex copolymers increase,the latex particle size decreases with the increase in HBS content.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.000
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueActa Polymerica SinicaSame topicDendrimers and Hyperbranched PolymersFrench-language works237,207