Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Why Can't I Be You traite des mecanismes d'identification et de nonidentification Cl l'autre qui surviennent en amour et qui se traduisent par differents phenomenes de meconnaissance dans la relation entre Alexandra, une femme minuscule et feminine, douce comme un oiseau , et William, un homme lourd, studieux et constipe, ayant les mains comme des jambons et les cuisses comme des [Lancs de breuf . Leur mauvaise lecture respective de l'autre atteint son parowysme lorsqu'Alexandra tue le lapin que William lui a apporte comme animal de compagnie, temoignage de son affection, geste qu'Alexandra rejette, cedant plutot aux fantasmes de ce Cl quoi ressemblerait l'amour entre ses mains fortes, la poussant contre le mur de telle fa(on, entrechoquant bruyamment la vaisselle, le rebord en saillie du buffet contre sa colonne vertebrale, les coutures dechirees, les ecchymoses de ses mamelons... William prefere la courtiser Cl travers Eschyle, Sophocle et Plotin... l'eolouir avec des mots, la distraire avec des mots .
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.065 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it