MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2245030382 · doi:10.1103/physrevc.82.035802

<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mmultiscripts><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mprescripts/><mml:none/><mml:mrow><mml:mn>16</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mmultiscripts></mml:math>(<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>α</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>γ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math>)<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mmultiscripts><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ne</mml:mi><mml:mprescripts/><mml:none/><mml:mrow><mml:mn>20</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mmultiscripts></mml:math><mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>S</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math>factor: Measurements and<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math>-matrix analysis

2010· article· lv· W2245030382 on OpenAlexafffund
H. Costantini, R. J. deBoer, R.E. Azuma, M. Couder, J. Görres, J. W. Hammer, P. J. LeBlanc, Hye Young Lee, S. O’Brien, A. Palumbo, E. C. Simpson, E. Stech, Wanpeng Tan, E. Uberseder, M. Wiescher

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review C · 2010
Typearticle
Languagelv
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicNuclear physics research studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaUniversität StuttgartTRIUMFNational Science Foundation
KeywordsPhysicsEnergy (signal processing)HeliumAlgorithmAtomic physicsComputer scienceQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The article presents new measurements of low-energy resonances in the $^{16}\mathrm{O}$($\ensuremath{\alpha},\ensuremath{\gamma}$)$^{20}\mathrm{Ne}$ reaction, which represents the endpoint for the reaction sequence responsible for energy production in stellar helium burning in massive red giant stars. The present data and previous unpublished data are analyzed in the framework of $R$-matrix theory to derive a reaction rate for the temperature regime of stellar helium burning.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.010
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Meta-epidemiology (broad), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.811
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0100.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0070.011
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.013
Bibliometrics0.0030.006
Science and technology studies0.0100.009
Scholarly communication0.0100.010
Open science0.0130.014
Research integrity0.0100.012
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1010.015

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations26
Published2010
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical Review CSame topicNuclear physics research studiesFrench-language works237,207